tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6984142198411061060.post4283478510460130691..comments2023-09-11T09:05:06.845-07:00Comments on Dr John's Health File: cancer research with a differance!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16820537514071667279noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6984142198411061060.post-78468388535770209772007-11-10T02:13:00.000-08:002007-11-10T02:13:00.000-08:00thankyou suzanne - very interesting points - I h...thankyou suzanne - very interesting points - I have looked at your links and note Dr Hamer's research on other diseases such as skin problems and MS. <BR/>Also I like his idea that bacteria and viruses are actually our friends - assisting our healing - what a beautiful and radical viewpoint!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16820537514071667279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6984142198411061060.post-67816905645806399332007-11-06T00:51:00.000-08:002007-11-06T00:51:00.000-08:00The german new medicine (GNM) seems to be a very ...The german new medicine (GNM) seems to be a very interesting theory. I think emotional factors are very important in the origin (and treatment) of many disease. I don't know if ALL cancers are caused by conflicts shocks (as Dr.Hamer says), but maybe most of them are. Only serious scientific research will tell us.<BR/><BR/>However, most attacks on the GNM and other alternative theories are based on rhetoric and ad hominem attacks. It's important to know that conventional medicine have a front group of propagandists (so-called quackbusters), who try to spread disinformation about alternative medicine. Most of these quackpots have been exposed recently in US courts:<BR/>http://www.canlyme.com/quackwatch.html<BR/>http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com/<BR/>http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/barrettvsrosenthal.htm<BR/>http://www.quackpotwatch.org/<BR/><BR/>They try to cover the serious deficiences of the conventional medicine and health care system:<BR/>http://www.noblindmen.com/Is%20US%20Health%20Really%20the%20Best.htm<BR/><BR/>Most of them are active members of so-called "skeptics" groups (also know as "paranormal" debunkers):<BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoskepticism<BR/>http://www.anomalist.com/commentaries/pseudo<BR/>http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/anomalistics/practices.htm<BR/>http://www.fiu.edu/~mizrachs/truzzi.html<BR/>http://members.aol.com/ddrasin/zen.html<BR/>http://www.discord.org/~lippard/stupid-skeptic-tricks.txt<BR/>http://paginas.terra.com.br/educacao/criticandokardec/criticizingskepticism.htm<BR/>http://www.rense.com/general51/seek3.htm<BR/><BR/>It's important to know in depth the "skeptic" agenda, their rhetorical tricks and dialectical ploys (to win arguments) and typical pseudo-rationalistic dogmatism, because most of them aren't reliable and objective source of information about alternative theories in science and we need to identify them. Their purpose is to debunk, attack, and difame any alternative theory and their supporters or researchers. They don't critize any aspect of conventional medicine neither of conventional science. <BR/><BR/>More info on Dr.Hamer's theories may be read here:<BR/>http://www.germannewmedicine.ca/<BR/>http://membres.lycos.fr/biologie/english/welcome.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com